BC school board trying to fire trustee critical of gender theory | Drea Humphrey with Barry Neufeld

Gender ideology was invented by pedophile activists Dr John Money and Simone de Beauvoir

She denied the biological origin of sexual differences

Beauvoir also formulated one of the bases of the current gender ideology: the anti-scientific affirmation that sex lacks a biological foundation: “One is not born, but rather becomes, a woman”, she affirmed in the aforementioned book. “No biological, psychic or economic destiny defines the figure that the human female has in the bosom of society; it is the whole of civilization that produces this intermediate product between the male and the castrated one that is described as feminine. This nonsense, defended marginally by Marxist ideologues for decades, has been assumed today even by parties that are on the Right, and it is serving to criminalize and persecute all those who defend a scientific fact such as the biological origin of the differences between man and woman.

Beauvoir signed a manifesto asking to legalize pedophilia

There are other aspects of Simone de Beauvoir’s thinking and political activity that are nowadays hidden in a surprising way. In her entries in the Wikipedia in Spanishin English and in French there is no mention of this fact. However, the French leftist newspaper Libération, founded by Jean-Paul Sartre (who was Beauvoir’s sentimental partner), recalled on February 23, 2001, an incident occurred in 1977. In January of that year three men were tried in France for sexually abusing, but without violence, of children under 15 years of age. The newspaper Libération published a manifesto claiming “recognition of the right of children and adolescents to maintain relationships with persons of their choice”Simone de Beauvoir was one of the signatories of that letter that defended the legalization of pedophile relations, and also of another letter published by the newspaper Le Monde on January 26, 1977 (see note at the end of the post).

She was fired for corrupting a minor student

Beauvoir’s endorsement of the legalization of pedophilia was not accidental. As Andy Martin recalled in The New York Times (also progressive media) on May 19, 2013, the feminist ideologist was fired from her job as a teacher in 1943 for corrupting a minor student. Someone might think that the dismissal was due to political causes, but the fact is that Beauvoir had collaborated with Radio Vichy, a station of the collaborationist regime of Pétain; a fact that she recognized in her memories.

https://www.sott.net/article/334768-The-gender-identity-concept-came-from-a-pedophile-and-human-experimenter

The idea started with a sexologist in 1955 named John Money. The concept of gender identity is: what you think you are socially is more important than what you are from a standpoint which balances social and personal views. One problem that stems from this idea is the belief that there are no meaningful differences between the terms “sex” and “gender”. John Money had different ideas. He proposed that if a boy were raised as a girl they would fundamentally be female, and there are no intrinsic differences between the sexes — contrary to biology.

He could not shill his ideas to anyone until he found a boy by the name of David Reimer. Shortly after birth, Reimer had lost his genitalia following an accident during his foreskin removal surgery. He decided to swoop in and perform some “progressive” human social experimentation on this helpless child who had just been mutilated. He had Reimer’s testicles also removed, and constructed an artificial vagina for him.

He then had his parents raise him as a girl while giving him hormone treatments. In what was by all measures the most extreme example of evil from Money, he had the young boy and his twin brother have fake sex acts at a young age in an attempt to make David to be a “bottom.” He even made them undress and do even more sex acts such as genital inspection, which he took photographs of on at least one occasion.

Money would later talk about his experiments as successful, despite the fact that David never identified as a woman and would later recall the visits with Money as traumatic.

Rockets fired toward south intercepted by Iron Dome

Sirens were sounded overnight Saturday, around 2:00 a.m., in Palmachim and the northern industrial area in Ashdod.

The IDF confirmed that two rockets were fired from the Gaza Strip toward Israeli territory. One launch did not trigger a siren in the Ashdod area in the absence of the need for it. The second launch triggered sirens in the city of Ashdod and in the Shfela region.

“Air defense fighters launched interceptors at the targets in accordance with policy,” the IDF statement said.

The Ashdod municipality confirmed that a siren was sounded in the northern industrial area of the city, but said no rocket had exploded in the city itself.

Shortly before the sirens, residents of the city of Ashkelon reported hearing explosions and seeing interceptions of rockets in the city’s skies. No alarm was sounded in this area.

In addition, residents in the Gush Dan area of central Israel reported an explosion and activities of the Iron Dome system.

No injuries or damage have been reported so far.

In response to the rocket fire, IDF fighter jets, helicopters and tanks attacked underground infrastructure and military positions of the Hamas terrorist organization in Gaza.

“The IDF is conducting an ongoing assessment of the situation and acts firmly and decisively against any attempt at terrorist activity against the citizens of the State of Israel and the violation of its sovereignty,” said the IDF Spokesperson’s Unit in a statement.

In late October, two rockets were fired from Gaza toward Israel. One of was intercepted by the Iron Dome system and another rocket exploded in an open area. There were no physical injuries or damages.

The IDF retaliated by striking Hamas military targets in Gaza.

Saturday night’s rocket fire towards the south comes as the IDF remains on high alert in the south on the one-year anniversary of the elimination of senior Islamic Jihad terrorist Baha Abu al-Ata, which was marked this past Thursday.

http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/291225

Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine trials showed ‘severe’ side effects, ‘fever and aches’

November 14, 2020 (LifeSiteNews) — Mere days after Pfizer announced its new “90% effective” coronavirus vaccine, reports have emerged about “severe” side effects volunteers for the vaccine trial experienced, including fevers and headaches.

According to the British Daily Mail, Carrie, one of the 43,538 participants in Pfizer’s vaccine trial, “said she suffered a headache, fever and aches all over her body, comparable to the flu jab, with the first one. But after the second these became ‘more severe.’”

The Pfizer vaccine will be administered in two doses three weeks apart.

Glenn Deshields, another participant, “said he suffered side effects not dissimilar to a ‘severe hangover.’” The man from Texas said he believes “he received the vaccine because when he had an antibody test with doctors it came back positive.”

“Bryan, 42, an engineer from Georgia, believes he was one of the individuals that did not receive the vaccine,” but a placebo. “He felt no immune response to the jabs, he said, and after having two shots he contracted [COVID-19] after his daughter caught it last month.”

A placebo is a shot not containing the vaccine, given to half of the participants in the trial to show if the vaccine actually works.

Stanley Wang from Los Angeles also thought he received a placebo, saying “he went for his first injection on August 31 and did not experience any pain from the jab nor coronavirus symptoms.”

Wang added that side effects experienced by other participants “included fever and migraines, and another complained of having a reaction ‘similar to having a hangover.’” It is unclear whether Wang was merely referring to the Daily Mail report, or to his own conversations with participants in the trial.

Pfizer didn’t mention any of the side effects experienced by participants in the vaccine trial.

The New York Times emphasized on Monday, “The data released by Pfizer … was delivered in a news release, not a peer-reviewed medical journal. It is not conclusive evidence that the vaccine is safe and effective, and the initial finding of more than 90 percent efficacy could change as the trial goes on.”

In fact, Pfizer’s press release mentioned 43,538 participants enrolled in the study, with only “94 confirmed cases of COVID-19 in trial participants.” This means that only 0.2 percent of participants were tested positive for the coronavirus.

As only 94 participants were tested positive, it also appears difficult to generalize the vaccine is “more than 90% effective,” since some people might have been exposed to the virus more frequently, or for a longer time.

Pfizer’s press release did not explain if participants were wearing masks, practicing so-called social distancing, or staying at home, for the most part.

The pharmaceutical company cautioned that it will continue “to accumulate safety data,” estimating “that a median of two months of safety data following the second (and final) dose of the vaccine candidate — the amount of safety data specified by the FDA in its guidance for potential Emergency Use Authorization — will be available by the third week of November.”

“Additionally, participants will continue to be monitored for long-term protection and safety for an additional two years after their second dose,” the press release pointed out, implying that side effects could still occur, and that the vaccine could lose its alleged efficacy.

In a July debate, Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., the nephew of John F. Kennedy and an environmental attorney, referred to Pfizer as one of several vaccine producers with a record of incurring criminal penalties for their products.

Kennedy noted that four of the leading developers of coronavirus vaccines, GlaxoSmithKlineSanofiPfizerMerck, are “convicted serial felon[s].”

“In the past 10 years, just in the last decade, those companies have paid 35 billion dollars in criminal penalties, damages, fines, for lying to doctors, for defrauding science, for falsifying science, for killing hundreds of thousands of Americans knowingly,” Kennedy said.

“It requires a cognitive dissonance for people who understand the criminal corporate cultures of these four companies to believe that they’re doing this in every other product that they have, but they’re not doing it with vaccines.”

Pfizer alone accounted for more than $4.7 billion in penalties since the year 2000.

In turn, the Trump administration in July announced “one of the largest investments yet, … a nearly $2 billion contract with Pfizer and a German biotechnology company for 100 million doses by December.”

Dr. Helen Watt of the Anscombe Bioethics Centre in Oxford, England, told the Catholic Herald last Monday that the Pfizer vaccine “makes no use of a foetal cell-line in the production process itself, and no use in the design,” but “[o]ne of the confirmatory lab tests on the vaccine did sadly involve an old foetal cell-line.”

The Children of God for Life organization says that the Pfizer vaccine is tested using the HEK 293 cell line, which is derived from kidney tissue taken from a healthy baby who was aborted in the Netherlands in the 1970s.

Infectious diseases specialist and professor of medicine at the University of Toronto Dr. Andrew Morris told the National Post that there are a number of questions still to be answered about the Pfizer vaccine.

“Does [the Pfizer vaccine] attenuate the disease? Does it reduce spread to other people?” Morris asked. “Those are equally important things.”

https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/pfizer-covid-19-vaccine-trials-showed-severe-side-effects-fever-and-aches

85% of New COVID-19 Infections Were in People Wearing Face Masks

85% of New COVID-19 Infections Were in People Wearing Face Masks

By:  David Deschesne

Fort Fairfield Journal, October 21, 2020

   Surgical face masks and bandanas are now all the rage in the public for stopping the dreaded coronavirus, despite an overwhelming body of scientific evidence proving they are wholly ineffective at stopping respiratory viruses.

   A new study, entitled “Community and Close Contact Exposures Associated with COVID-19 Among Symptomatic Adults = 18 Years in 11 Outpatient Health Care Facilities – United States, July 2020,”1 was  published by the CDC COVID-19 Response Team on September 11, 2020 in the US CDC’s Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report.  The report showed that 85 percent of Case-Patients with a positive PCR test for SARS CoV-2 (COVID-19) infection, and showing symptoms, were in people who reported wearing a cloth face covering or mask either “often” or “always” 14 days before the illness onset.

   Of the case-patient group of 154 people who had both symptoms and a positive PCR test, 108 reported they had “Always” worn a cloth face covering or mask and 22 reported wearing one “Often” prior to symptom onset.  6 people out of the 154 positive COVID-19 infections reported “Never” wearing a face mask.

   The control group was comprised of people from the same health care facilities as the Case-Patients Group.  The Control Group had symptoms (fever, runny nose, etc) but a negative SARS CoV-2 PCR test result.  Of the 160 people in the control group with fever, runny nose and other symptoms – but a negative PCR test –  118 reported that they “Always” wore a face mask and 23 reported wearing a face mask “Often”.  This leads to a rate of 88% of the people who wore face masks in the control group still getting infected with some form of respiratory virus that was not necessarily COVID-19.

   Again, 85% or more of the people who caught COVID-19 wore a face mask, which goes to further prove the science that says face masks don’t stop respiratory virus transmission.

   The report also showed how the odds of getting infected from COVID-19 were the lowest in shopping/grocery store settings, office settings and salons.  It was highest in a Bar/Coffee shop setting, followed by churches or religious gatherings and then gyms.  These are about the same odds as catching any respiratory virus like the common cold or seasonal flu.

1. Ref:  https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/69/wr/pdfs/mm6936a5-H.pdf

http://fortfairfieldjournal.com/ffj/2020/10212003b.html