Massive Danish study on surgical masks found no statistically significant benefit against COVID-19

Most Western elites are telegraphing the message that we will be forced to cover our humanity with cheap Chinese face burkas indefinitely. They are mandating that even two-year-olds must wear masks. The long-term effects on the lungs, emotional and behavioral problems, and development of infants and toddlers is enormous. For such an unconstitutional invasion of personal liberty, they are responsible to show us some amazing degree of effectiveness of this cultish ritual. In fact, the data show the opposite.

The much-vaunted Danish mask study was finally published today in the prestigious Annals of Internal Medicine. Now we know why three medical journals were so averse to publishing its findings. The study completely obliterates the cultish devotion to masks. The results of this massive real-life controlled experiment show that the group that wore surgical masks in April experienced a 0.38% lower infection rate than the control group that did not wear masks. That is about one-third of one percent, which is so low that it could just be statistically random variances that demonstrate no definitive efficacy even to that infinitesimal level.

……………………………………………………..

Abstract

Background:

Observational evidence suggests that mask wearing mitigates transmission of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). It is uncertain if this observed association arises through protection of uninfected wearers (protective effect), via reduced transmission from infected mask wearers (source control), or both.

Objective:

To assess whether recommending surgical mask use outside the home reduces wearers’ risk for SARS-CoV-2 infection in a setting where masks were uncommon and not among recommended public health measures.

Design:

Randomized controlled trial (DANMASK-19 [Danish Study to Assess Face Masks for the Protection Against COVID-19 Infection]). (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04337541)

Setting:

Denmark, April and May 2020.

Participants:

Adults spending more than 3 hours per day outside the home without occupational mask use.

Intervention:

Encouragement to follow social distancing measures for coronavirus disease 2019, plus either no mask recommendation or a recommendation to wear a mask when outside the home among other persons together with a supply of 50 surgical masks and instructions for proper use.

Measurements:

The primary outcome was SARS-CoV-2 infection in the mask wearer at 1 month by antibody testing, polymerase chain reaction (PCR), or hospital diagnosis. The secondary outcome was PCR positivity for other respiratory viruses.

Results:

A total of 3030 participants were randomly assigned to the recommendation to wear masks, and 2994 were assigned to control; 4862 completed the study. Infection with SARS-CoV-2 occurred in 42 participants recommended masks (1.8%) and 53 control participants (2.1%). The between-group difference was −0.3 percentage point (95% CI, −1.2 to 0.4 percentage point; P = 0.38) (odds ratio, 0.82 [CI, 0.54 to 1.23]; P = 0.33). Multiple imputation accounting for loss to follow-up yielded similar results. Although the difference observed was not statistically significant, the 95% CIs are compatible with a 46% reduction to a 23% increase in infection.

Limitation:

Inconclusive results, missing data, variable adherence, patient-reported findings on home tests, no blinding, and no assessment of whether masks could decrease disease transmission from mask wearers to others.

Conclusion:

The recommendation to wear surgical masks to supplement other public health measures did not reduce the SARS-CoV-2 infection rate among wearers by more than 50% in a community with modest infection rates, some degree of social distancing, and uncommon general mask use. The data were compatible with lesser degrees of self-protection.

Primary Funding Source:

The Salling Foundations.

https://www.acpjournals.org/doi/10.7326/M20-6817

The shocking reason why Pfizer’s coronavirus vaccine requires storage at -70C … because it contains experimental nanotech components that have NEVER been used in vaccines before

You’re seeing the reports all over the news: Pfizer’s new coronavirus vaccine requires storage at -70C (-94F), which is much colder than the North Pole. If it’s not stored at this temperature, its ingredients begin to break down and it fails to work. Currently Pfizer is claiming, without evidence, that its vaccine is “90% effective.” But this claim is little more than corporate propaganda designed to drive up stock prices through false projections.

But why do these vaccines need to be kept at -70C in the first place?

The answer, it turns out, is because they contain potentially hazardous ingredients that have never been used in vaccines before.

As Children’s Health Defense explained in an August 6th article, “mRNA vaccines undergoing Covid-19 clinical trials, including the Moderna vaccine, rely on a nanoparticle-based “carrier system” containing a synthetic chemical called polyethylene glycol (PEG).”

CHD goes on to explain:

The use of PEG in drugs and vaccines is increasingly controversial due to the well-documented incidence of adverse PEG-related immune reactions, including life-threatening anaphylaxis.

Roughly seven in ten Americans may already be sensitized to PEG, which may result in reduced efficacy of the vaccine and an increase in adverse side effects.

If a PEG-containing mRNA vaccine for Covid-19 gains FDA approval, the uptick in exposure to PEG will be unprecedented—and potentially disastrous.

Moderna documents and publications indicate that the company is well aware of safety risks associated with PEG and other aspects of its mRNA technology but is more concerned with its bottom line.

Lipid nanoparticles cause hyperinflammatory responses in the body, leading to severe reactions, hospitalization and potentially DEATH

Why are LNPs (Lipid Nanoparticles) used in these vaccines? As CHD further explains:

LNPs “encapsulate the mRNA constructs to protect them from degradation and promote cellular uptake” and, additionally, rev up the immune system (a property that vaccine scientists tamely describe as LNPs’ “inherent adjuvant properties”)

In other words, the LNPs are adjuvants, meaning they are designed to cause hyperinflammatory responses in human beings, once injected. This is done in an effort to induce the creation of antibodies that then allow the vaccine manufacturer to claim high “effectiveness” rates, even when those very same adjuvants cause severe adverse reactions.

According to recent vaccine trials conducted by Moderna, 100% of human subjects in the high-dose vaccine trial group experienced adverse reactions.

UK government prepared for a vaccine death wave

The adverse reactions caused by mRNA coronavirus vaccines are so widespread that the UK government recently admitted it is expecting a massive wave of coronavirus vaccine “adverse reactions” / side effects. As described in my previous article, “VACCINE DEATH WAVE: UK government posts bid for AI system to process the expected flood of COVID-19 vaccine injuries and side effects described as a ‘direct threat to patient life’“:

The UK government has posted a bid and an award contract notice, seeking an Artificial Intelligence (AI) system that can process the expected flood of covid-19 vaccine injuries and side effects.

That bid explains, in the government’s own words:

The MHRA urgently seeks an Artificial Intelligence (AI) software tool to process the expected high volume of Covid-19 vaccine Adverse Drug Reaction (ADRs) and ensure that no details from the ADRs’ reaction text are missed.

In other words, they already know these vaccines are going to kill a huge number of people.

David Knight featured a UK whistleblower on his show today who revealed that coronavirus vaccine adjuvants are demonstrating a 97% sterility rate in women who take the vaccine. This is what happens when you turn your protein synthesis over to evil corporations who are pursuing a global depopulationa agenda:

Coronavirus vaccine deaths will be categorized as covid-19 deaths to keep the scam going

Most importantly, as people start dying from coronavirus vaccines, the medical establishment will categorize all those deaths as “covid-19 deaths” in order to claim the pandemic is getting worse.

This will create a whole new cycle of death, media hysteria and mandatory vaccine policies. Those, in turn, will kill even more people, feeding into the very same feedback loop that results in even more people being vaccinated and killed.

Ultimately, the vaccines themselves will likely end up killing more people than the coronavirus. And we will have achieved George Orwell’s authoritarian medical nightmare where the “treatment” keeps the pandemic going in perpetuity, all while the entire scamdemic is used to crush human freedom and enslave people in their own homes and apartments, all around the world.

This is what happens when you let Big Pharma collude with the deep state to crush human freedom and work toward their ultimately goal of mass genocide against the human race.

Bill Gates is no doubt celebrating right now, even before the mass deaths begin.

If you want to survive all this, resist the coronavirus vaccine at all costs. Resist vaccine violence with every means of self-defense you have available, or you will be killed.

(Check back later, we are adding a podcast and a flow diagram to this story…)

The AstraZeneca vaccine, by the way, is made with aborted human fetal cells from a 14-week-old male baby. So if you get injected with this vaccine, it’s medical cannibalism, and you’re supporting the baby body parts harvesting-for-profit industry (i.e. Planned Parenthood baby chop shops).

https://www.distributednews.com/475569.html

Canadian military’s plan to use ‘propaganda’ on public to achieve COVID lockdown compliance is shut down

OTTAWA, November 16, 2020 (LifeSiteNews) — Canada’s Armed Forces has been told to shelve a plan to manipulate the attitudes and behaviors of the nation’s residents through propaganda techniques aimed at moving the public to comply with Covid-19 lockdown measures. 

The Ottawa Citizen reported November 16 that the Assistant Deputy Minister for Public Affairs had announced the program, which targeted Canadians, was being shut down. In an email to staff, Laurie-Ann Kempton stated that “Canadians must have absolute confidence in knowing that we completely understand our role in informing the public space of our initiatives and activities.”  
Kempton added, “They must know that they are not targets.”

The announcement followed revelations published by the Ottawa Citizen earlier this month that the Canadian military wanted to create a “Defence Strategic Communication” organization. This would have used “propaganda and other techniques to try to influence the attitudes, beliefs and behaviours of Canadians,” the Citizen reported. A draft of the proposal was sent around National Defence Headquarters in the capital city last month. 

According to the Citizen, the plan was the “end result” of the “weaponization” of the Canadian Armed Forces’ public affairs arm. The newspaper also reported in July that the military had planned to ensure Canadians’ compliance with the Covid-19 shutout by rolling out methods it had used in a foreign war zone.  

“That campaign was to use similar propaganda tactics to those employed against the Afghan population during the war in Afghanistan, including loudspeaker trucks to transmit government messages,” the Citizen reported

“The propaganda operation was halted after concerns were raised about the ethics behind such techniques.”

The military also had plans “to collect and analyze data” from Canadians’ social media accounts.  It had already begun to do so by, for example, collecting negative remarks about Ontario Premier Doug Ford and his handling of the Covid-19 pandemic.

According to the Citizen, the military team justified this as necessary “to help troops who were to work in long-term care homes during the coronavirus pandemic.” The social media accounts examined included Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram. The information was sent on to the Ontario government. 

Another social media tactic the military considered was to use the personal social media accounts of selected Armed Forces staff members to get out official military and governmental messages to the public. They also proposed developing ties with academics already friendly with the military and with retired personnel with an eye to disseminating their messages through their accounts or when speaking with the media.  

According to the Citizen, the project was launched by General Jonathan Holbert Vance, Canada’s Chief of the Defence Staff, and approved by the Minister of Defence Harjit Sajjan in 2015. The defence strategy of Justin Trudeau’s Canadian government has, since 2017, included an enhanced development of information warfare.  

Before the project became known to the public, the Canadian Armed Forces had already spent more than $1 million to train its public affairs officers in “behavior modification techniques” like those used by SCL Group (formerly Strategic Communications Laboratories), the parent company of Cambridge Analytica. The “Facebook-Cambridge Analytica scandal” involved the secret hijacking of millions of Facebook accounts by the consulting firm to create political advertising. 

The military had also been caught in a mock disinformation campaign that accidentally became authentic when faked warnings from the government of the province of Nova Scotia about wolves became public

David Mulroney, a Distinguished Fellow at the University of Toronto’s Munk School of Global Affairs and Public Policy, told LifeSiteNews that he is comforted by his low estimation of military intelligence. 

“What keeps me from being overly worried is that I have a very low estimation of the ability of the military brass to understand public opinion, much less influence it,” he said via social media.

“That said, this speaks to the fact that the Chief of the Defence Staff is no longer matched with and balanced by an experienced and authoritative civilian Deputy Minister,” he continued. 

“I recall days when a powerful civilian Deputy Minister of National Defence could and would challenge bad ideas like this.”
Among Mulroney’s other roles, including Canada’s Ambassador to China from 2009 to 2012, he has served as the Deputy Minister responsible for the Afghanistan Task Force, Associate Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs, and Foreign and Defence Policy Adviser to Canada’s Prime Minister.

Asked why aiming propaganda at one’s own citizens is wrong, given the historic use of propaganda in wartime, Mulroney said it was a question of trust.

“It erodes public trust,” he said, “and we’re not at war, when it may be necessary to conceal information for national security purposes, or to mislead the enemy.”

“And Canadians are not the enemy.”

Peggy Mason of Ceasefire Canada, a citizens’ watchdog group that scrutinizes public policy, stated online, “While we commend the Minister of National Defence for shutting down this ill-conceived initiative, we also urge him to adopt robust policy and doctrine on information operations which include a clear differentiation between activities to inform Canadians and operations targeting adversaries.”

Mason drew attention to an essay by retired Navy captain Dave Scanlon, who urged that “Canadian values” not be sacrificed in the attempt to win the information war. 

“Fighting disinformation is a serious whole-of-nation challenge. It requires an informed public, ethical and transparent government, an engaged private sector, a vigorous and valued free press, and armed forces that respect and reflect Canadian values,” Scanlon stated.

https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/canadian-militarys-plan-to-use-propaganda-on-public-to-achieve-covid-lockdown-compliance-is-shut-down