Mexican Program Accidentally Proves Covid Vaccine Magnet Theory While Attempting To Debunk It

In the broadcast, a TV doctor explains the phenomenon going viral on social media showing metal objects being magnetized to Covid-19 vaccine injection sites.

“But why is this happening?” a Sale el Sol show host asks after seeing a video of a woman sticking a phone up to her arm.

“I don’t know,” Dr. Pepe says, “but let’s see if it happens to me.”

When a metal object fails to stick to his injection site, he asks vaccinated people around him to volunteer for the experiment.

The spoon fails to stick to a woman and two men, but the doctor is baffled when it actually sticks to a fourth volunteer.

“Yes, that’s curious,” the doctor says, allowing the show host to also try the experiment.

Again it sticks to the man’s vaccine injection site.

Dr. Pepe next tests out whether a cell phone would stick to the injection site, which it does.

“In truth, I don’t know,” Dr. Pepe says, failing to come up with an explanation for the phenomenon.

Mexican Program Accidentally Proves Covid Vaccine Magnet Theory While Attempting to Debunk It (

Pfizer vaccine linked to heart inflammation in young men, Israeli experts conclude

 In a preliminary report submitted Tuesday, June 1, to Israel’s Ministry of Health, researchers found a probable link between the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine and cases of heart inflammation following vaccination.

The ministry first heard of the issue in April after health officials reported at least 60 cases of myocarditis or inflammation of the heart muscle in young men.

Most of them received the second dose of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine a few days before they developed the condition. The reports prompted the ministry to appoint a panel of experts to investigate the issue.

The panel included public health experts and infectious disease specialists from Tel Aviv University, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology and the University of Haifa.

Experts find “likelihood of connection” between cases of heart inflammation and Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine

Between one in 3,000 and one in 6,000 men aged 16 to 24 years who were vaccinated with the vaccine from Pfizer developed myocarditis, according to the report. However, most of the cases were mild and were resolved within a few weeks.

Even so, the report suggests that the vaccine puts young men at an increased risk of developing myocarditis. The condition affected 275 of the five million people who received the vaccine over the last six months. Most patients who developed the condition were under 30 years of age. Many were male patients.

Symptoms of myocarditis include tightness in the chest, shortness of breath, fever, palpitations and fatigue. Though often mild, myocarditis can lead to life-threatening outcomes, such as heart attack and stroke.

Based on their findings, the Israeli researchers concluded that there is a “likelihood of connection” between receiving the second dose of the vaccine by Pfizer and the onset of myocarditis in men aged 16 to 30 years.

The connection also appears to be stronger in young people aged 16 to 19 years compared to other ages. The likelihood of developing myocarditis following vaccination also seems to decrease as age increases.

Dror Mevorach, head of one of the COVID-19 units at Hadassah Hospital Ein Kerem in Jerusalem and head of the panel, said their analysis “is very suggestive of a causal nature” between the two. He added that he is convinced there is a relationship.

Peter Liu, a cardiologist with the University of Ottawa Heart Institute who wasn’t part of the panel, said it’s important to investigate the potential link between receiving the second vaccine dose and the onset of myocarditis, even if there is only a “hint of a signal.” However, Liu said scientists should also look into other population groups in order to be certain that the link does exist.

In a statement, Pfizer said it has not observed a higher rate of myocarditis than would normally be expected given a large population. The pharmaceutical giant also said it was aware of the Israeli panel’s findings. However, Pfizer said the findings established no causal link between the vaccine and myocarditis.

BioNTech, on the other hand, said more than 300 million doses of its vaccine have been administered globally. The company also said that the “benefit-risk profile” of its vaccine remains positive. (Related: BioNTech CEO: Third dose of coronavirus vaccine necessary after a year, followed by annual booster shots.)

In a statement, BioNTech said a careful assessment of the reports of myocarditis is ongoing. It has not been concluded. “Adverse events, including myocarditis and pericarditis, are being regularly and thoroughly reviewed by the companies as well as by regulatory authorities,” the company said.

Health officials in the United States are also investigating cases of myocarditis in young men who received a COVID-19 vaccine. In a report posted on its website last month, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) said the cases occurred within four days of being injected with the second dose of an mRNA vaccine. Males reported more cases than females.

However, the CDC said it has yet to determine whether the onset of myocarditis and the COVID-19 vaccines are related and how, if so. has more articles about the adverse side effects linked to COVID-19 vaccines.

Sources include:

Pfizer vaccine linked to heart inflammation in young men, Israeli experts conclude –

Caught Red-Handed: CDC Changes Test Thresholds To Virtually Eliminate New COVID Cases Among Vaxx’d

New policies will artificially deflate “breakthrough infections” in the vaccinated, while the old rules continue to inflate case numbers in the unvaccinated.

The US Center for Disease Control (CDC) is altering its practices of data logging and testing for “Covid19” in order to make it seem the experimental gene-therapy “vaccines” are effective at preventing the alleged disease.

They made no secret of this, announcing the policy changes on their website in late April/early May, (though naturally without admitting the fairly obvious motivation behind the change).

The trick is in their reporting of what they call “breakthrough infections” – that is people who are fully “vaccinated” against Sars-Cov-2 infection, but get infected anyway.

Essentially, Covid19 has long been shown – to those willing to pay attention – to be an entirely created pandemic narrative built on two key factors:

  1. False-positive tests. The unreliable PCR test can be manipulated into reporting a high number of false-positives by altering the cycle threshold (CT value)
  2. Inflated Case-count. The incredibly broad definition of “Covid case”, used all over the world, lists anyone who receives a positive test as a “Covid19 case”, even if they never experienced any symptoms.

Without these two policies, there would never have been an appreciable pandemic at all, and now the CDC has enacted two policy changes which means they no longer apply to vaccinated people.

Firstly, they are lowering their CT value when testing samples from suspected “breakthrough infections”.

From the CDC’s instructions for state health authorities on handling “possible breakthrough infections” (uploaded to their website in late April):

For cases with a known RT-PCR cycle threshold (Ct) value, submit only specimens with Ct value ≤28 to CDC for sequencing. (Sequencing is not feasible with higher Ct values.)

Throughout the pandemic, CT values in excess of 35 have been the norm, with labs around the world going into the 40s.

Essentially labs were running as many cycles as necessary to achieve a positive result, despite experts warning that this was pointless (even Fauci himself said anything over 35 cycles is meaningless).

But NOW, and only for fully vaccinated people, the CDC will only accept samples achieved from 28 cycles or fewer. That can only be a deliberate decision in order to decrease the number of “breakthrough infections” being officially recorded.

Secondly, asymptomatic or mild infections will no longer be recorded as “covid cases”.

That’s right. Even if a sample collected at the low CT value of 28 can be sequenced into the virus alleged to cause Covid19, the CDC will no longer be keeping records of breakthrough infections that don’t result in hospitalisation or death.

From their website:

As of May 1, 2021, CDC transitioned from monitoring all reported vaccine breakthrough cases to focus on identifying and investigating only hospitalized or fatal cases due to any cause. This shift will help maximize the quality of the data collected on cases of greatest clinical and public health importance. Previous case counts, which were last updated on April 26, 2021, are available for reference only and will not be updated moving forward.

Just like that, being asymptomatic – or having only minor symptoms – will no longer count as a “Covid case” but only if you’ve been vaccinated.

The CDC has put new policies in place which effectively created a tiered system of diagnosis. Meaning, from now on, unvaccinated people will find it much easier to be diagnosed with Covid19 than vaccinated people.


Person A has not been vaccinated. They test positive for Covid using a PCR test at 40 cycles and, despite having no symptoms, they are officially a “covid case”.

Person B has been vaccinated. They test positive at 28 cycles, and spend six weeks bedridden with a high fever. Because they never went into a hospital and didn’t die they are NOT a Covid case.

Person C, who was also vaccinated, did die. After weeks in hospital with a high fever and respiratory problems. Only their positive PCR test was 29 cycles, so they’re not officially a Covid case either.

The CDC is demonstrating the beauty of having a “disease” that can appear or disappear depending on how you measure it.

To be clear: If these new policies had been the global approach to “Covid” since December 2019, there would never have been a pandemic at all.

If you apply them only to the vaccinated, but keep the old rules for the unvaccinated, the only possible result can be that the official records show “Covid” is much more prevalent among the latter than the former.

This is a policy designed to continuously inflate one number, and systematically minimise the other.

What is that if not an obvious and deliberate act of deception?

Caught Red-Handed: CDC Changes Test Thresholds To Virtually Eliminate New COVID Cases Among Vaxx’d | ZeroHedge