Day: June 14, 2021
Black Judge Gives 16-Year Old Boy 241 Years!
CDC: 5,888 DEAD 329,021 Injured From COVID-19 Shots – More Than Previous 29 Years Of VAERS Vaccine Deaths
Recorded deaths following the experimental COVID-19 injections soared this week as the CDC added more data yesterday into the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), a U.S. Government funded database that tracks injuries and deaths caused by vaccines.
While the information contained in VAERS is publicly available information, the corporate media continues to censor it, and anyone who dares to publish publicly available information from the U.S. Government is labeled as “fake news” by the “fact checkers.”
The data released yesterday, June 11, 2021, lists 5,888 deaths among 329,021 cases of injuries following COVID-19 shots. There are also another 5,884 life-threatening cases, 43,892 ER visits, 4,583 permanent disabilities, and 19,597 hospitalizations.
To put this into perspective, these totals represent a 6-month period since December, 2020, when the FDA gave emergency use authorization to these shots, and the death total now exceeds deaths recorded in VAERS following vaccinations for the past 29 years, since the beginning of 1992.
This is genocide. And as many dissenting medical doctors and scientists have stated, these are bioweapon shots designed by eugenicists to reduce the world’s population.
European Database Of Adverse Drug Reactions For COVID-19 Shots: 13,867 DEAD And 1,354,336 Injuries
CDC And FDA Finally Admit Heart Inflammation Problems Occurring From COVID Shots
The CDC and FDA met this past week on June 10, 2021, and finally admitted that there were hundreds of reported cases of Myocarditis and pericarditis (inflammation of the heart) following mRNA shots.
Prior to this meeting, the only thing they were willing to admit was that there were “rare” cases of blood clots in the brain, while choosing to ignore a myriad of other reported conditions, including many other types of blood clots.
The June 10th report stated that there were 216 reports of heart inflammation after the first doses of the Pfizer and Moderna shots, and 573 reports after the second shots.
The median age after the first shot was 30-years-old, while the median age after the second shot was only 24-years-old. It is affecting more than twice as many males as females.
Given the fact that these reported cases represent only a tiny minority of actual cases, due to the passive nature of reporting to VAERS, it is obvious that we have a national crisis on our hands caused by the pharmaceutical companies and their experimental shots.
The government is not your friend, and it doesn’t matter if you live in a Red or Blue State, as they are all pro-vaccine.
While some Red State governors have taken action to prevent discrimination via Vaccine Passports, not a single governor in the U.S. has come forward to put a stop to the massive campaigns to inject as many people as possible with these bioweapons, which are now focused on children, even though they have the power to do so through their executive powers.
Not one. They are ALL complicit with murder.
Plandemic Proof: No Debate Required! Quarantine Act Changed in 2019 to Allow for no Debate before Its Use
By: Greg Staley
Written On: 2021-06-14
The Quarantine Act in Canada allows the government to “make an interim order containing any provision that could be contained in a regulation made under section 62 or 63 if the Minister is of the opinion that immediate action is required to deal with a significant risk, direct or indirect, to public health.” These orders used to be subject to debate through the Parliamentary process but that is no longer the case thanks to Bill C-97 which received royal assent on June 21st of 2019.
The quarantine act is very similar to the Emergencies Act which effectively allows the federal government to declare martial law but it differs in one very big way. Unlike the Emergencies Act, the Quarantine Act doesn’t require parliamentary oversight as it was amended so that it no longer requires regulations made under the act to be brought to the House of Commons or the Senate. This means that the debate process that normally takes places in our democracy isn’t required anymore.
Sections 62.1 and 62.2 Repealed
Section 62.1 and 62.2 were both repealed in June of 2019 with the passing of Bill C-97. This is very important to know because section 62.1 of the Quarantine Act says that ” the Governor in Council may not make a regulation under section 62 unless the Minister has first caused the proposed regulation to be laid before both Houses of Parliament.
Section 62.2 of the Quarantine Act says that a regulation may be made without “being laid before each house of parliament” if the Minister believes the changes are so “immaterial or insubstantial that section 62.1 should not apply in the circumstances.” Although section 62.2 of the Quarantine Act allowed for changes to be made without going to parliament first, ultimately, if the Minister made changes without Parliament being involved they were still accountable to Parliament at the end of the day – something that is no longer the case thanks to the repeal of this section and section 62.1.
How was the amendment passed into law?
Believe it or not, the amendment that repealed these two sections of the Quarantine Act was included in Bill C-97, which is titled “An Act to implement certain provisions of the budget tabled in Parliament on March 19, 2019, and other measures.” So essentially, Canadians received a major amendment to our Quarantine Act and it was passed by the Federal Finance Minister Bill Morneau under the guise of implementing a budget. Can you imagine – politicians not being transparent (gasp).
Canadians received a major amendment to our Quarantine Act and it was passed by the Federal Finance Minister Bill Morneau under the guise of implementing a budget.
Greg Staley
What’s disturbing to me about this is the realization that not only was there a major amendment to the Quarantine Act that’s now being exploited (In my opinion), but it happened 10 months before the first lockdown in Canada – and it was passed in a budget bill. My gut feeling is that the Liberals didn’t want the Canadian public knowing about the amendment – they wanted it kept secret. Otherwise, why wouldn’t you make it known that a major amendment had been made that would allow the government to essentially declare a form of martial law under the Quarantine Act without parliamentary oversight? Perhaps it’s because it would look bad 10 months later when it became apparent to the Canadian public that the amendment was being heavily exploited.
Bill C-97 Vote Breakdown by Party
The Liberals voted unanimously in favour of the bill 163-0 and the bill passed with 167 votes for and 130 votes against. The Conservative and NDP party voted unanimously no to Bill C-97.
Canada Man's Sandbox 