The Government of Ontario has just admitted that PCR tests and Rapid Antigen tests are UNRELIABLE


Manitoba Chief Microbiologist and Laboratory Specialist: 56% of positive “cases” are not infectious

POSTED ON: MAY 11, 2021

WINNIPEG:  The Justice Centre represents churches and individuals who are challenging government lockdown restrictions in the Court of Queen’s Bench as unjustified violations of the Charter freedoms to associate, worship, and assemble peacefully. The hearing commenced on May 3, 2021 and is continuing this week.

The onus is on the Manitoba Government to justify its restrictions on Charter rights and freedoms as being reasonable, necessary and beneficial.

One of the crucial issues in this trial is the operation and reliability of the Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) test that is used by governments across Canada, including the Manitoba Government, to diagnose Covid and measure its spread.

Woman Sues Abortion Clinic After Horrific Botched Abortion Nearly Killed Her

An Alabama woman has filed a medical malpractice suit against the West Alabama Women’s Center (WAWC) abortion facility in Tuscaloosa and one of its abortionists, Tamer Middleton, after she endured a near-fatal botched second trimester abortion last December.

Her complaint detailed her injuries that bear similarities to those that resulted in the death of WAWC patient April Lowery in May 2020.

The plaintiff filed her suit on November 11, 2021, under the pseudonym Jane Stone.  Her true name is sealed under a protective order.

Jane Stone was lucky to survive her ordeal, which included being misled about the abortion process and its potential complications, forced dilation of an inadequately prepared cervix that resulted in cervical lacerations and perforation, uterine perforation, sliced broad uterine ligament and arteries, massive internal hemorrhaging, and a refusal of WAWC staff to heed her pleas for an ambulance to transport her to the hospital until she lost consciousness.

German chemist Dr. Andreas Noack found DEAD after exposing presence of graphene hydroxide in covid “vaccines”

On Nov. 23, a world-renowned German chemist by the name of Dr. Andreas Noack put out a video (you can watch it at the Daily Exposé) exposing the presence of graphene hydroxide in Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) “vaccines.” Three days later, Noack mysteriously died.

While the specific circumstances surrounding Noack’s death remain unknown, it is being reported that he was “attacked,” which resulted in his passing. This is according to Noack’s pregnant wife, who published her own video after his death to sound the alarm.

“On the day of his graphene hydroxide video, he developed breathing difficulty and died in the early morning on Nov. 26, 2021,” Noack’s wife revealed in the video.

Noack’s wife further made the suggestion that perhaps Noack was targeted with a directed energy weapon, or DEW, since he was not attacked in an obvious sense with a blunt object. Instead, Noack developed some kind of strange respiratory ailment on the very same day that he exposed one of the contents of Fauci Flu shots.

“It was on the day when the graphene hydroxide video was released and the interview with herald Thiers took place,” Noack’s wife explained in German. “Then we went upstairs onto the gallery; we relaxed, talked, laughed, told each other how much we love each other.”

“Then, he wanted to go downstairs into the kitchen to get something to nibble on, and normally he does not spend more than one minute there, so I went downstairs and said jokingly, ‘you eat everything away from me again.’ In that moment, he started to sway and I thought he was making fun of me – it looked like he was playing.”

Was Noack murdered by the powers that be?

It was at this point that Noack’s wife still thought he was pretending and tried to kiss him, telling him to stop. But Noack did not stop, and what happened next is even more shocking.

“In that moment, the electricity went off and the whole thing happened 20-30 minutes after the interview, and then Andreas collapsed in his arms,” she went on to explain. “He began to moan, had severe pain.”

“His body completely tensed, and all of a sudden he could not talk anymore. At first, I thought he might have been poisoned because he made some choking sounds. So, I instilled him with Sole (like salt water), then he vomited what he had eaten during the day, which wasn’t much. I just couldn’t do anything.”

Noack’s wife stayed with him while he remained “paralyzed” in a way that she could not describe, and helped keep his body upright so he would not strike his head. Noack was eventually able to go upstairs on his own but continued to have trouble breathing before eventually succumbing to a second round of paralysis.

“He couldn’t breathe anymore and I started to scream,” she recalls. “I yelled at him that he should get out of this condition and come back to me. I cried and he tried to comfort me. I was busy then to make sure Andreas can breathe well.”

Emergency responders tried to help Noack’s wife resuscitate him over the phone for what she says felt like hours. Eventually, six of them showed up in person and connected him to machines, as well as to a ventilator.

Noack’s wife was told that her husband would be saved during this process, but that never panned out. He was taken to the hospital where he would never leave, with doctors saying that “his large heart valve ha[d] failed completely” due to a heart attack.

The latest news about Chinese Virus tyranny and terrorism can be found at

Sources for this article include:

The presence of a virus does NOT mean “disease:” PCR testing scheme EXPOSED as total science fraud

Many people are still unaware of this, but the infamous PCR test for the Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) is not an accurate tool for detecting the presence of this alleged “virus” inside people’s bodies. Not only that, but the presence of a virus does not equate to the presence of disease, despite what the government claims.

The Brownstone Institute put together an excellent paper about this subject that exposes the PCR testing scheme as a fraud.

Before the PCR test was invented in 1983, scientists had to wait for viruses to grow naturally in order to identify them. PCR technology changed all this by rapidly multiplying very small amounts of viral DNA in an exponential series of heating and cooling cycles.

The process is fully automated and only takes about an hour. The problem is that it can be tuned (i.e. misused) to pick up things that are not necessarily there.

“PCR revolutionised molecular biology but its most notable application was in genetic fingerprinting, where its ability to magnify even the smallest traces of DNA became a major weapon in the fight against crime,” the paper explains.

“But, like a powerful magnifying glass or zoom lens, if it’s powerful enough to find a needle in a haystack it’s powerful enough to make mountains out of molehills.”

PCR test inventor vehemently opposed to using it to diagnose diseases

Even Kary Mullis, the inventor of the PCR test and winner of the 1993 Nobel Prize in Chemistry, recognized this. He went so far as to warn against using his PCR test to try to diagnose disease.

“PCR is a process that’s used to make a whole lot of something out of something,” Mullis stated. “It allows you to take a very miniscule amount of anything and make it measurable and then talk about it like it’s important.”

In other words, PCR tests should never have been used to try to diagnose people with “covid.” And yet this is what health authorities all around the world have been doing, deceiving and enslaving the public in the process.

It turns out that the PCR test can be calibrated to a cycle count so high that it will pick up pretty much anything and render someone “positive.” This is exactly what happened with covid, especially in areas with low rates of mask-wearing and vaccine-taking.

If the government wanted to make it seem like masks were working to “stop the spread,” then it would cycle down the PCR tests in areas of high compliance – and vice versa.

The other thing to keep in mind is that trace amounts of “covid,” assuming it even exists, would not be the same kind of threat as large amounts of covid. And yet the PCR test when applied in this manner sees no difference between small or large quantities of whatever it is that is being tested.

“Bacteria and viruses are different from other toxins, but the principle is the same,” Brownstone says. “Because they multiply and increase their dose with time, maximum permissible doses need to be based on the minimum dose likely to start an infection, known as the Minimum Infective Dose (MID).”

“PCR tests magnify the number of target DNA particles in a swab exponentially until they become visible. Like a powerful zoom lens, the greater the magnification needed to see something, the smaller it actually is.”

There is currently no standard measure of viral load in clinical samples. There is also no way to reproduce PCR test results because the nucleic acid target (the pathogen of interest), platform and format all differ.

More related news about coronavirus deception can be found at

Sources for this article include: