LGBTQ Charity Penned “Tribute” To Gay Rights Pioneer Who Claimed That Pedophiles Were Being Oppressed

Gayle Rubin, Pat Califia, Michel Foucault – the first queer theorists – all openly advocated for pedophilia, and the founding document of queer theory “Thinking Sex” spends over half its length supporting NAMBLA and man-boy lovers. All the original queer theorists argued for a total transgression of every sexual norm, and for people to apply anarchist theory to sexuality, including pedophilia.

……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..

A queer archival project is featuring an uncritical “tribute” to the co-founder of one of the most notorious pro-pederasty groups in the world. The LGBTQ History Project, a 501(c)(3) non-profit, claims it is “dedicated to preserving the lives and legacies of LGBTQ+ activists from the first wave of gay liberation.”

Incorporated as a tax-exempt organization in 2020, the LGBTQ History Project is run by August Bernadicou, who started recording interviews with the “pioneers” of the gay movement when he was just 13 years-old.

“Through our efforts, we aim to shed light on the stories and experiences of those who fought for LGBTQ+ rights. A shared history fosters empathy, bridges divisions, and works towards a future where everyone can thrive regardless of sexual orientation or gender identity,” the Project explains on their website. “We aspire to create a society that embraces equality and justice. We seek to nurture empathy and compassion, contribute to a more inclusive world, and evolve with the community’s needs.”

One of the “pioneers” highlighted by the charity is David Thorstad, the co-founder of the North American Man-Boy Love Association and a former member of the Trotskyist Socialist Workers Party.

On the LGBTQ History Project’s page for Thorstad, he is described as “consistently [fighting] to limit oppression based on sexual preferences,” adding that he fought against “the extreme oppression of men and boys in mutually consensual relationships.”

Under Thorstad’s leadership, NAMBLA lobbied to abolish age of consent laws and fought to free men who had been convicted of the statutory rape of children from prison.

Thorstad was among the NAMBLA executives named a defendant in the infamous Curley v. NAMBLA litigation, in which the organization was represented by the ACLU. The lawsuit was launched in 2000 by the family of a 10-year-old boy who had been raped and murdered by two pedophiles.

One of the pedophiles who had kidnapped, sexually tortured, and ultimately killed the child was a member of NAMBLA at the time the crime was committed, and pro-pedophilia literature produced by NAMBLA was found in his vehicle. The Curley family accused NAMBLA of inciting child sexual abuse with their “adult-child sexual relationship propaganda.”

In 1981, Thorstand wrote a pamphlet titled “Boys Speak on Boy Love” in which he boasted that “NAMBLA believes that children need more than just sexual freedom, but it also recognizes that the denial of sexual pleasure can inflict severe and lasting pain.” The pamphlet featured a number of “testimonies” claimed to be written by pubescent boys who endorsed adult-child sexual relationships.

Despite Thorstad’s claims that being a man who wanted to have sex with underage boys was akin to being a “Jew in Nazi Germany,” the LGBTQ History Project not only boosted an article from Thorstad in 2019, but also posted a heartfelt tribute to him following his death in 2021. In the 2019 article, Thorstad slammed Stonewall for being too concerned with assimilating into wider society.

“I am sad and shook by the untimely passing of David Thorstad,” Bernadicou wrote in his statement, revealing that in the two years before his death, they conversed over email at least 745 times, with the former feeling that he felt “connected” to the latter.

“While I don’t agree with some of his politics, our exchanges have impacted how I see the world and myself. I guess we are both underdogs—lost in a time loop of yesterday if that day even existed. He was the last of the dying breed; fighters who never cared and cared even less the older they got,” Bernadicou concluded in his statement about the man who created one of the most well-known pro-pedophile groups in the United States.

But Bernadicou’s connections to Thorstad and organizations with questionable links go farther. In his autobiography, he proudly boasts that he received the Charles Shively Award in Gay Liberation from the William A. Percy Foundation in 2023.

The foundation’s namesake, William A. Percy III, was a gay studies professor from Boston who died in 2022. On his personal website, he hosted many of Thorstad’s writings, and the organization that bears his name also posting a number of concerning articles.

One such article positively reviewed the book from Allyn Walker, a female-to-male “non-binary” academic, who was forced to resign from a criminal justice assistant professorship for defending the “dignity” of “minor attracted people.” Another article hosted by the foundation claimed pedophilia to be purely a “moral panic,” with a third arguing that there is no link between viewing child pornography, and becoming a child molester.

In 2021, Bernadicou was also given the Troy Perry Media Activism Award. Reverend Troy Perry is the founder of the Metropolitan Community Church, with a ministry for the LGBT community. As such, he has been invited to the White House by Presidents Carter, Clinton, and Obama.

“Men Having Babies”: Surrogacy Agency Helps Gay Men Buy Children, Leading To Backlash And Concern Online

The commercial surrogacy industry has grown substantially in recent years and is expected to reach a market value of $129 billion by 2032. The increase in interest in the controversial practice has also created a rise in organizations that aim to connect expectant parents with these surrogacy services. 

Men Having Babies (MHB) is one such service. Created in 2012, it began as a peer support network for gay fathers. Now, the nonprofit connects gay men with fertility clinics, egg donors, surrogates, and law firms. They also provide financial assistance programs and advocate for legislation to make surrogacy more accessible to gay men.

In 2021, MHB worked with RESOLVE: The National Infertility Association and the National Center for Lesbian Rights (NCLR) to amend the Illinois insurance code requiring insurance companies to cover fertility-related services for single individuals and gay couples by redefining infertility to include, “a person’s inability to reproduce either as a single individual or with a partner without medical intervention.” The bill took effect in January of 2022.

“The anguish and yearning same-sex couples and singles feel when they cannot afford the expensive treatments required to counteract their ‘social infertility’ is comparable to that of heterosexual couples who suffer from medical infertility,” the nonprofit said in a letter of support sent to Illinois legislators.

On their Instagram, Men Having Babies regularly posts photos of the men who have utilized their services, typically posing with the children created through their surrogate arrangements. The overwhelming majority of the children appear to be boys.

One recent post features a couple named Carlos and Pat who received $100,000 in “Family Building Benefits” from Pat’s employer Meta to help finance their surrogate arrangement.

Carlos and Pat are the founders of BUM: Bottoms Up Movement, a start-up company that sells intimate and anal hygiene products aimed at gay men with a portion of sales going towards “…making LGBTQ family building more affordable,” according to their website, which includes making contributions to Men Having Babies.

BREAKING: 9th Circuit Court of Appeals Rules mRNA COVID-19 Jab is NOT a Vaccine Under Traditional Medical Definitions

The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit has delivered a seismic decision that could reshape public health policy across the nation. In a contentious case involving the Health Freedom Defense Fund and other plaintiffs versus the Los Angeles Unified School District (LAUSD), the court has declared that mRNA COVID-19 injections do not qualify as vaccines under traditional medical definitions. The case revolved around the LAUSD’s COVID-19 vaccination policy, which required all employees to be fully vaccinated against COVID-19 by a specified deadline. The plaintiffs argued that the district’s vaccine mandate infringed upon their fundamental right to refuse medical treatment, as the mRNA injections do not prevent the transmission of COVID-19 but merely mitigate symptoms for the recipient. The court’s opinion, penned by Circuit Judge R. Nelson and supported by Judge Collins, asserts that the mRNA shots, marketed as vaccines, do not effectively prevent the transmission of COVID-19 but merely reduce symptoms in those who contract the virus. This crucial distinction undermines the foundational premise of the vaccine mandates enforced by various governmental and educational institutions. Judge Nelson pointed out that the mandate was inconsistent with the Supreme Court’s century-old ruling in Jacobson v. Massachusetts, a case that upheld the state’s right to enforce smallpox vaccinations due to their proven effectiveness in preventing disease spread. In contrast, the mRNA COVID-19 shots do not offer such public health benefits, thus failing the criteria established by Jacobson. The ruling points out that traditional vaccines are designed to provide immunity and prevent transmission, which is not conclusively proven in the case of mRNA COVID-19 shots. The Gateway Pundit previously reported that the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) had modified the definition of “vaccine” to include the mRNA shots. So, look at what the CDC did. Here’s the definition the CDC used on 26 August 2021: Vaccine– “a product that stimulates a person’s immune system to produce immunity to a specific disease.” Vaccination– “the act of introducing a vaccine into the body to produce immunity to a specific disease.” Rather than admit the COVID-19 vaccine is not working as advertised, the CDC took a page out of Orwell’s 1984 and opted for new spin language. Here is the new definition: Vaccine– “a preparation that is used to stimulate the body’s immune response against diseases.” It can be recalled that Pfizer’s President of International Developed Markets, Janine Small, admitted in an EU hearing that the vaccine had never been tested on its ability to prevent transmission, contrary to what was previously advertised. Judge Collins, in a concurring opinion, highlighted that compulsory medical treatments for individual health benefits infringe upon the fundamental right to refuse such treatments. This perspective aligns with the constitutional principles protecting personal liberty against unwarranted governmental intrusions. You can read the full ruling below:
BREAKING: 9th Circuit Court of Appeals Rules mRNA COVID-19 Jab is NOT a Vaccine Under Traditional Medical Definitions
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/wp-content/plugins/pdfjs-viewer-shortcode/pdfjs/web/viewer.php?file=https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/22-55908.pdf&attachment_id=1159763&dButton=true&pButton=true&oButton=false&sButton=true#zoom=auto&pagemode=none&_wpnonce=e76f942712

read the entire ruling from the court