Retired Lieutenant Colonel’s microphone is CUT at Memorial Day ceremony in Ohio when he started talking about how freed black slaves first marked the holiday

Interracial Marriage

American Legion officials cut a veteran’s microphone at a Memorial Day ceremony on Monday, when he began speaking about how the holiday was first marked by a group of freed black slaves.

The ceremony organizers turned off the microphone for about two minutes in the middle of Lt. Col. Barnard Kemter’s 11-minute speech, just as he was starting to talk about how the holiday was born out of a ceremony in which freed slaves honored deceased soldiers at the end of the Civil War.

He explained: ‘Memorial day was first commemorated by an organized group of freed black slaves less than a month after the Confederacy surrendered.’

But moments later the sound was cut, leaving Kemter looking confused and tapping the  microphone, before continuing with his speech without amplification.

Cindy Suchan with the Hudson American Legion Lee-Bishop Post 464 in Ohio told the Akron Beacon Journal that organizers wanted the part…

View original post 220 more words

Black Misandry: Black Woman on Twitter @chocolatecarame who lusts after White men Calls Black men “Ape” and “Conquered Apes” and “Nakers”

saved and archived

have a twitter threat showing her lusting after white men

saved and archived

calling black men “Nakers” the mild form of the n word “nigger”


“The Virus Is Fictitious.” CDC Sued by 7 Universities’ Scientists for Huge Fraud

By Enza Ferreri

In a previous post we have reported how Dr. Stefano Scoglio, Ph.D., B.Sc., Italian 2018 Candidate Nobel Prize in Medicine came to the conclusion that it’s not sure this virus exists, and that he’s one of the increasing number of medical prestigious professionals who question the reality of the claimed “isolation” of the SARS-Cov-2 virus and the validity of the RT-PCR test supposedly able to detect it.

No Trace of This Virus at All. Found Only Type A and B Influenza Viruses

Now even more evidence emerges casting serious doubts on the existence of the novel coronavirus which is reputed to cause the alleged new disease Covid-19.

Dr. Derek Knauss, clinical scientist and immunologist-virologist at a Southern California laboratory, says he and his colleagues from 7 universities are suing the CDC for massive fraud.

Dr. Derek Knauss says:

I have a PhD in virology and immunology.

I’m a clinical lab scientist and have tested 1,500 “supposed” positive COVID-19 samples collected here in Southern California.

When my lab team and I subjected the 1,500 supposedly positive Covid-19 samples to Koch’s postulates and put them under an SEM (electron microscope), we found NO Covid in all 1,500 samples. We found that all 1,500 samples were primarily Influenza A, and some Influenza B, but no cases of Covid. We did not use the [unreliable] PCR test.

When we sent the rest of the samples to Stanford, Cornell, and a couple of the labs at the University of California, they came up with the same result: NO COVID. They found Influenza A and B. Then we all asked the CDC for viable samples of Covid. The CDC said they can’t give them, because they don’t have those samples.

So we came to the hard conclusion through all our research and lab work that Covid-19 was imaginary and fictitious. The flu was only called ‘Covid,’ and most of the 225,000 deaths were from co-morbidities such as heart disease, cancer, diabetes, pulmonary emphysema, etc.. They got the flu which further weakened their immune systems, and they died.

I still need to find one viable sample with Covid-19 to work with. We who conducted the lab test with these 1,500 samples at the 7 universities are now suing the CDC for Covid-19 fraud. The CDC still has not sent us a viable, isolated and purified sample of Covid-19. If they can’t or won’t, then I say there is no Covid-19. It’s fictional.

The four research papers describing the genome extracts of the Covid-19 virus never managed to isolate and purify the samples. All four papers describe only small pieces of RNA that are only 37 to 40 base pairs long. That is NOT a VIRUS. A viral genome normally has 30,000 to 40,000 base pairs.

Now that Covid-19 is supposedly so bad everywhere, how come not one lab in the world has completely isolated and purified this virus? That’s because they never really found the virus. All they ever discovered were small pieces of RNA that were not identified as the virus anyway. So what we’re dealing with is just another flu strain, just like every year. Covid-19 does not exist and is fictitious. [Emphasis added]

I want to underline all this because it’s something of momentous and shocking importance. The results of these lab tests were staggering.

Not even one single allegedly positive test was found to have SARS-CoV-2, the virus believed to be the cause of the new disease Covid-19 . There was no trace of this virus at all. Scientists found only type A and B influenza viruses.

Even the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), when requested to provide virus samples, admitted not to have any availability of them.

At that point, Dr. Knauss and his scientist colleagues concluded that the virus does not exist because no one has been able to bring incontrovertible evidence of its existence. They took the flu, called it “Covid-19” and created the most enormous scam in history. The public believed it and still believes it.

This could help explain why the flu has practically disappeared from the statistics collected since the beginning of the “Covid pandemic”. See the following WHO data on numbers of global influenza cases per week, from the first week of 2020.

You can check for yourself from here:

This Is Consistent with Previous Findings of Other Scientists

In 2021 Samuel Eckert’s German Team and the Isolate Truth Fund offered a reward of $265,000 for any scientist who can provide incontrovertible evidence that the SARS-CoV-2 virus has been isolated and therefore exists. They too pointed out that not even one lab in the world has yet been able to isolate this virus.

Some scientists “claim” they have, but their “isolation” is only of a sample from the human body, a “broth” of different kinds of cells, remains of viruses, bacteria, and so on. As we saw in our previous post, this is what Medicine Nobel Prize candidate Dr. Scoglio said, that the supernatant, the upper part of the patients’ centrifuged pharyngeal or bronchoalveolar fluid, an extremely complex matrix, was erroneously called “isolated virus”.

In December 2020 a team working with Canadian investigative journalist Christine Massey submitted no less than 40 Public Access Law requests to medical authorities worldwide simply asking for evidence that the SARS-CoV-2 virus has been isolated, which is the basis on which its existence can be objectively proven. Not one of the authorities requested was able to provide that evidence.

Dr. Tom Cowan, Dr. Andrew Kaufman and Sally Fallon Morell recently published a statement on “the continuing controversy over whether the SARS-CoV-2 virus is isolated or purified. But based on the official Oxford definition of “isolation” (“the fact or condition of being isolated or secluded, a separation from other things or persons, standing alone”), common sense, the laws of logic and the rules of science dictate that any unbiased person must come to the conclusion that the SARS-CoV-2 virus has never been isolated or purified. As a result, no confirmation of the existence of the virus can be given.

The logical and scientific implications of this fact are that the structure and composition of something whose existence cannot be proven cannot be known, including the presence, structure and function of hypothetical spike or other proteins. The genetic sequence of something that has never been found cannot be known, nor can the “variants” (mutations) of something whose existence has not been demonstrated. It is therefore impossible to show that SARS-CoV-2 causes a disease called Covid-19.

Combined PCR test for corona and influenza ‘because there’s hardly any difference’
Not surprisingly, the world’s largest biotech company, China’s BGI, recently launched a new PCR test that can simultaneously test for influenza A, B and corona. Apart from the proven fact, acknowledged trough various lawsuits, that a PCR test cannot prove infection with any virus whatsoever, BGI’s explanation that both diseases are so difficult to distinguish from each other and that they have therefore made only one test, says more than enough. Maybe there IS no difference at all, ‘Covid’ is just another name for ‘old familiar’ flu viruses, and this is just another clever marketing trick?[Emphasis added]


I must admit that at the beginning of this declared pandemic I also was persuaded of its truthfulness by the hammering, continuous propaganda.

It all seemed very strange, unheard of. There’s never been a worldwide imprisonment of entire innocent healthy populations in human history before. It seemed enormous. The reaction made it look like the bubonic plague had returned, except that the current extreme measures had not been taken even in the presence of much more deadly and severe epidemics.

So, some doubts lingered in my mind but I wanted to give, probably naively, the powers-that-be the benefit of the doubt.

Then, bit by bit, many pieces of this puzzle didn’t seem to fit. Explanations from politicians, their medical “experts” and the media started to be contradictory, refuting what they had said before but without acknowledging a mistake or a reason for changing tune. Their declarations and predictions from epidemiological models adopted the constant habit of being contradicted by events and evidence.

Now, I think that we’ve got to the point at which the probability that the dominant discourse is the truth has shown itself to be low and to get lower by the day.

“The Virus Is Fictitious.” CDC Sued by 7 Universities’ Scientists for Huge Fraud (

Canada first gave Big Pharma immunity, but now launches ‘ Vaccine Injury Support Program’

OTTAWA, Ontario, June 4, 2021 (LifeSiteNews) – After announcing last year vaccine makers would be shielded from liability regarding COVID-19 jab related injuries, the Canadian federal government has launched the nation’s first-ever program designed to financially compensate those who have suffered adverse side effects from any type of vaccines.

The Vaccine Injury Support Program (VISP) was officially announced in December 2020, around the time the federal government under Prime Minister Justin Trudeau allowed the first COVID-19 injections for use in Canada.

Canada’s Chief Medical Officer Dr. Theresa Tam announced the launch of VISP on Tuesday.

According to the VISP website, the purpose of the program is to “ensure that all people in Canada who have experienced a serious and permanent injury as a result of receiving a Health Canada authorized vaccine, administered in Canada on or after December 8, 2020, have fair and timely access to financial support.”

In December 2020, Canada’s Procurement Minister Anita Anand was quoted as confirming to reporters that “indemnification clauses in vaccine contracts are standard,” and that they would be used for COVID-19 vaccine makers.

“All countries, generally speaking, are faced with the issue of indemnification of companies, especially in cases of novel technologies like this,” said Anand. “Yes we are, and we are definitely not any different than any other country in this world.”

In a Public Health Agency of Canada (PHAC) document from 2017, which was updated in 2019, the agency stipulated that in times of pandemic, indemnity clauses should be used so there is no supply disruption.

“To prevent delays in release of the vaccine at time of pandemic, the pandemic vaccine supply contract stipulates that the Government of Canada will indemnify the manufacturer against any claims or lawsuits brought against it by third parties,” the document reads.

Shortly after the Canadian government announced VISP, the government put out a tender contract notice to “eligible organizations to submit an application to administer a no-fault support program for people in Canada with a serious and permanent vaccine injury.”

According to the VISP website, the program is being administered and delivered “independently” by the Canadian accounting and tax firm Raymond Chabot Grant Thornton, with funding from PHAC.

“Decisions on individual claims are made by a committee of independent medical experts and neither PHAC nor Health Canada is involved in the decision of individual claims,” says the VISP website.

Health Canada has authorized four COVID-19 injections for adults, all of which are connected to abortion. All of them have also been associated with severe side effects such as blood clots, rashes, miscarriages, and even heart attacks in young healthy men.

The Pfizer vaccine has been approved for use in kids aged 12 to 16, and just recently, the National Advisory Committee on Immunization stated that the “mixing” of COVID-19 jabs is permissible for those who had the AstraZeneca vaccine.

Health Canada states that all COVID-19 vaccines on offer are allowed to operate under an interim order, which is in effect until September 16, 2021.

In Canada, health is under the full authority of the provinces, and vaccines are not mandatory at the federal level. Some provinces — such as Ontario and New Brunswick — have made certain vaccines mandatory via legislation, with a few exceptions, for children to attend public schools.

The VISP website states that all current and “future Health Canada authorized vaccines or immunoglobulins” will be covered on the program which is open to all ages.

One does not need to be a Canadian citizen to be awarded a settlement from the program, but the vaccine must have been administered in Canada.

When it comes to compensation under the program, VISP states that eligible individuals can file a claim, but only up to three years after receiving a jab, “or at the apparent onset of injury, or death.”

Canada first gave Big Pharma immunity, but now launches ‘ Vaccine Injury Support Program’ | News | Lifesitenews

Evangelical Lutheran Church in America Accept Self-Mutilation as Christian

In 251 A.D., a young woman resisted the sexual advances of Quintian, a Roman proconsul.  Her resistance cost her a sentence in a local brothel and, eventually, her life.  Before she died, she was subjected to tortures that included having her breasts torn off by pinchers.  To the end, she refused to give in to the sexual predator who sought to force her to repudiate her Christian faith.

St. Agatha’s endurance despite the tortures inflicted on her, including being deprived of one of the chief markers of her femininity, earned her a spot among the numerous Catholic saints who refused to renounce their identity in Christ.  She believed that her body was the temple of the Holy Spirit.  It was not to be violated by rape and by torture that sought to deprive her of her bodily integrity.  She is considered an example to follow. 

The tortures visited upon St. Agatha have been visited on women for centuries.  Until the 19th century, a “breast ripper,” also known as the “Iron Spider,” was used to punish women guilty of sexual transgressions.  Removing breasts was a way of destroying a woman’s sexuality — indeed, her womanhood.

Even today, rituals such as breast ironing and female genital mutilation are a means of eliminating women’s identity in order that they become less sexually tempting.  Ironically, it is mostly women who inflict such tortures on other women.

In view of the above, it is with great astonishment and anger that both secular and religious women see self-torture as spiritual progress by a branch of the Lutheran church.  It is with shock that we see sexual mutilation held up as a positive advance for women — so much so that it is being incorporated into a denomination that once stood for the elevation of women.

We are speaking of the recently appointed bishop of the Evangelical Lutheran church, Megan Rohrer.  Rohrer, who identifies with the trans movement, has had her breasts surgically removed and now wishes to be referred to with the preferred pronouns “they” and “them.”

We should feel sorrow for a woman who has chosen to have her breasts cut off.  We wonder if Megan was ever told as a little girl that she was loved and treasured as a beautiful child created by God.  What happened to cause her effectively to murder her womanhood, to commit a partial suicide of her feminine being?  Why did she accept an invented story about transformation into some being other than her womanly self?

We don’t know the answers.

An equally important question is this: how did the Evangelical Lutheran church come to the point where it considered elevation to the position of bishop of a person committed to an ideology ratifying self-mutilation and repudiation of identity as a woman as great progress in the Christian faith?  How did Rohrer, now an ordained overseer of the sheep, priest and anointed bishop in the Evangelical Lutheran church, become an appointed representative of Jesus Christ, the Great Physician, who is a healer of bodies and souls?

What gospel message is the Lutheran church preaching when it selects as a pastor a woman who has repudiated the Lutheran doctrine of the human being created imago dei, male and female?  One can only wonder what Luther himself would have thought about a woman who has voluntarily mutilated herself and who has spurned identification as “she” in favor of “they.”  He himself knew about the ineffectiveness of self-flagellation and extreme bodily harm as a means of attaining salvation.  He concluded that salvation came not by torture of the body, but by faith in Christ.

One also can only wonder how someone who holds an indeterminate identity as neither man nor woman and who now holds a position in which “they” are to advise “their” flock in all things spiritual will uphold Christian doctrines concerning human identity and redemption of men and women by the Son of God who is also the Son of Man.

Further, can the Lutheran hierarchy not see that acceptance of the ideology of the trans movement effectively paralyzes the impulse to address abuse of women (and men)?  By accepting self-mutilation as a means of progress for women, the trans movement vitiates efforts to curb and to stop mutilations such as female genital mutilation and breast-ironing — just to cite two examples. 

A great expenditure of time and energy of Christian missionaries and others concerned about women’s welfare has been aimed at stopping torture of women just for being women will be almost completely nullified by acceptance of trans ideology.  The fact is that if women’s self-torture is ratified and the chief indicating markers of their sex are removed, becoming part of routine and accepted medical procedures in an effort to create a facsimile of a “man,” or a “person,” the impeti toward correcting abuses of women is blunted.

After all, the leap from an individual will to self-mutilate to communal will to oppress and torture women is not a big one.  Most human rights activists are familiar with social networks that openly support practices such as female genital mutilation.  

How many in the Lutheran church recognize how utterly anti-woman (and anti-male) the trans movement is?  There is a reason we don’t hear much about female genital mutilation from trans activists.  It’s because drugging with hormones and bodily mutilation are pillars of the ideology, which overwhelmingly affects women.  In fact, the trans movement could be said to be the modern idealization of the Aristotelian notion that women are intrinsically deformed and the male is the ideal. 

The main issues, then, do not primarily include consideration of Megan Rohrer’s feelings about herself.  As Glenn Stanton pointed out in his article in The Federalist, “Megan, as a person, deserves absolute compassion and care for her deep psychological and emotional pain.”  But Christian sainthood is not based on psychological indeterminacy and personal pain.  It is based on faith in Christ.

Luther never repudiated the divine origin of the human race as created male and female in the image of God.  He retained the Christian belief that the body as well as the soul is redeemed and will be transfigured.  The only person who will bear the saving marks of mutilation will be Jesus Christ, not those he came to seek and to save.  

The trans message is not Lutheran.  It is not Catholic.  It is not Eastern Orthodox.  It is not Southern Baptist or Reformed theology of the body. 

In a word, it is not Christian.

Christians believe in the resurrection of the body, which is to become like Christ’s body, glorified and made to dwell eternally in Heaven.  Let the world posit malformation, deformation, torture, and even the sale of the body as a transformative and beautiful thing, a wonderful thing.  Christians must have none of it.

Christians must feel the same revulsion toward the elevation of self-mutilation as salvific that they have had toward the practices of burning widows alive, child prostitution, slavery, female genital mutilation, and sex trafficking. 

As the Lutheran confessions state, “God created us body and soul.  The Son redeemed both body and soul with His blood.  The Spirit sanctified both body and soul by the Gospel.  And, on the Last Day, our bodies and souls shall be reunited to live immortal, imperishable lives in bliss forever.”

Those confessions also reject attempts to annihilate human identity, also refusing “the teaching that the resurrection should be conceived in such a way as to exclude the body (in effect the Gnostic heresy that matter is essentially evil and that only the ‘spirit’ is capable of being saved).”

Christians believe in the salvation of body and soul by Christ.  He is the only Person who for all eternity will have visible scars indicating he was wounded for the transgressions of mankind.

Evangelical Lutherans Accept Self-Mutilation as Christian – American Thinker

A Black LGBT man was arrested for defending himself against his white male romantic partner.